Centene Corporation: Medicaid's Profiteer
Centene Corporation has been under intense scrutiny for its aggressive practices within Medicaid programs. From massive overbilling schemes to deceptive marketing tactics, Centene's actions have consistently prioritized profits over the well-being of millions of vulnerable Americans.
- Denial Rate
- 24%
- Total Members
- 28M+
- 2023 Revenue
- $144.5B
- CEO Compensation
- $14.2M
Major Controversies
Medicaid Fraud and Pharmacy Overbilling Settlements
Centene faced widespread allegations across multiple states for overcharging Medicaid programs through its pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), Envolve Pharmacy Solutions. These overbilling schemes involved double-billing for pharmacy services, leading to significant financial penalties.
In 2021, Centene paid $88 million to Ohio and $55 million to Mississippi to settle claims of double-billing. By 2023, they reached a $215 million settlement with California for inflating prescription drug costs under Medi-Cal. By 2024, Centene had paid over $1.25 billion in settlements across at least 15 states, including Washington ($19 million) and Texas ($165.6 million).
They exploited Medicaid's systems to siphon off billions, undermining the very programs meant to support the most vulnerable.
The Impact:
- •$1.25B+ in settlements across 15 states
- •Double-billing for pharmacy services
- •Overcharging Medicaid programs

Key Findings
- →According to court documents, settlements reached with at least 15 states
- →State investigations confirmed systematic pharmacy overbilling
- →Multiple states documented double-billing for pharmacy services
RICO Lawsuit Over Ambetter Health Plans
A class-action lawsuit filed in 2024 alleges that Centene defrauded consumers through its Ambetter health insurance plans by selling policies that many doctors would not accept. Plaintiffs claim Centene misrepresented provider networks and coverage quality, violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.
The lawsuit involves consumers across 26 states who purchased Ambetter plans under false pretenses. Judge Nancy L. Maldonado allowed the case to proceed, citing sufficient evidence of mail and wire fraud. This marks a significant escalation in legal challenges against Centene's marketing and network practices.
They leveraged deceptive practices to mislead consumers, undermining trust and access to quality care.
The Impact:
- •Alleged RICO violations through deceptive practices
- •Coverage misrepresentations
- •Judge allowed case to proceed

Key Findings
- →Federal judge found sufficient evidence to proceed with RICO claims
- →Lawsuit alleges systematic misrepresentation of provider networks
- →Case involves Ambetter plans across multiple states
Medicare Advantage Star Ratings Lawsuit
In October 2024, Centene sued the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) over a downgrade in its Medicare Advantage star ratings, alleging unfair treatment. Centene claims that CMS penalized them based on a single failed call during a secret shopper test, costing the company $73 million in lost revenue.
Centene argues that CMS’s methodology was arbitrary and flawed, asserting that similar lawsuits have been filed by other insurers like Humana and UnitedHealth Group. This lawsuit challenges the fairness and transparency of CMS’s star rating system, which significantly impacts Medicare Advantage plan revenues and reputations.
They contest the integrity of CMS’s evaluation methods, aiming to protect their financial interests and market standing.
The Impact:
- •$73M in lost revenue due to rating downgrade
- •Alleged arbitrary and flawed CMS methodology
- •Similar lawsuits filed by other major insurers

Key Findings
- →Company filed legal challenge against CMS rating methodology
- →Dispute centers on secret shopper testing procedures
- →Similar challenges filed by other major insurers
Class Action Over Fraudulent Health Plans
In May 2024, consumers filed a class-action lawsuit alleging that Centene sold health plans with deceptive provider networks, leaving patients unable to access care from listed doctors or hospitals. Plaintiffs claim they were misled into purchasing plans that lacked adequate provider coverage, violating consumer protection laws in at least 11 states.
This lawsuit highlights systemic issues with transparency in health plan marketing. Consumers discovered the discrepancies only after attempting to seek care, revealing a pattern of misleading information intended to inflate plan enrollments and profits.
They engaged in deceptive marketing to boost enrollments, at the expense of genuine patient care access.
The Impact:
- •Misleading provider network information
- •Consumer protection laws violated in 11 states
- •Inadequate access to listed doctors and hospitals

Key Findings
- →Class action filed in multiple states over provider network accuracy
- →Plaintiffs allege widespread provider directory inaccuracies
- →Consumer protection violations alleged in 11 states
Pension Fund Lawsuit Over Medicaid Fraud Settlements
In 2022, the Bricklayers Pension Fund sued Centene’s board for failing to prevent Medicaid fraud, which resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements. The lawsuit alleged that board members ignored red flags about overbilling schemes involving pharmacy services.
However, in July 2024, a Delaware judge dismissed the case, ruling insufficient evidence of bad faith by the board. This case underscores governance concerns related to compliance oversight, highlighting the need for better internal controls and accountability within Centene’s leadership.
They neglected their fiduciary duties, allowing rampant fraud to continue unchecked.
The Impact:
- •Alleged negligence by board members
- •Hundreds of millions in Medicaid fraud settlements
- •Case dismissed due to lack of evidence

Key Findings
- →Delaware court dismissed claims against board members
- →Lawsuit alleged failure to prevent Medicaid fraud
- →Court found insufficient evidence of bad faith
South Carolina Medicaid Overcharging Settlement
In January 2024, Centene paid $25 million to South Carolina to resolve allegations of overbilling for pharmacy services under Medicaid programs. The state alleged that Centene misrepresented costs, failed to disclose discounts, and filed improper reports.
This settlement is part of broader investigations into PBM practices across multiple states, highlighting systemic issues with transparency and accountability in Centene’s pharmacy management operations.
They manipulated billing practices to maximize profits, at the expense of state Medicaid funds and patient care.
The Impact:
- •$25M settlement to South Carolina
- •Misrepresentation of pharmacy costs
- •Failure to disclose negotiated discounts

Key Findings
- →$25M settlement reached with South Carolina
- →State alleged improper pharmacy cost reporting
- →Settlement part of broader multi-state investigations
California Medi-Cal Fraud Settlement
In February 2023, Centene paid $215 million to California after allegedly inflating prescription drug costs under the state’s Medi-Cal program. Investigators found that Centene pocketed discounts negotiated with CVS Caremark instead of passing them on to Medi-Cal.
This settlement is one of the largest involving Medi-Cal fraud in California’s history, demonstrating the scale and impact of Centene’s fraudulent practices within state Medicaid programs.
They exploited negotiated discounts to unlawfully siphon funds from California’s Medicaid program.
The Impact:
- •$215M settlement with California
- •Inflated prescription drug costs under Medi-Cal
- •Withheld negotiated discounts from Medi-Cal

Key Findings
- →$215M settlement with California confirmed
- →Investigation found failure to pass on negotiated discounts
- →Among largest Medi-Cal fraud settlements to date
Allegations of Failing to Disclose PBM Discounts
Multiple lawsuits have alleged that Centene failed to disclose discounts negotiated by its PBM subsidiaries, leading to inflated costs for state Medicaid programs. These allegations span several states, including Washington, which required a $19 million settlement.
These practices highlight systemic issues with transparency in PBM operations, where Centene prioritized internal savings over passing negotiated discounts onto Medicaid programs. This lack of transparency resulted in higher drug costs and undermined the financial integrity of state Medicaid funds.
They concealed significant discounts, artificially inflating costs and draining Medicaid resources.
The Impact:
- •Failed to disclose PBM-negotiated discounts
- •Inflated Medicaid program costs
- •Settlements across multiple states

Key Findings
- →Multiple state investigations documented undisclosed PBM fees
- →Washington state settlement confirmed improper practices
- →Pattern of non-disclosure identified across states
Allegations of Deceptive Marketing Practices
Centene has faced ongoing scrutiny for deceptive marketing practices as part of broader lawsuits filed through late 2024. Plaintiffs allege that Centene misled consumers about the scope and quality of its health plans, including inaccurate provider directories ("ghost networks") and inadequate coverage options.
These allegations have been raised in both individual lawsuits and class actions, highlighting a persistent pattern of misleading information intended to attract enrollments without ensuring genuine access to quality healthcare services.
They deceived consumers with false promises, prioritizing enrollment numbers over actual care quality and access.
The Impact:
- •Misleading provider directories ("ghost networks")
- •Inaccurate coverage quality representations
- •Class and individual action lawsuits filed

Key Findings
- →Multiple lawsuits allege provider directory inaccuracies
- →Court documents show pattern of marketing complaints
- →Cases pending in several jurisdictions
Broader Investigations Into Medicaid Managed Care Practices
Since the mid-2010s, state attorneys general have scrutinized Centene’s practices related to Medicaid managed care contracts. Investigations have focused on improper billing practices, lack of transparency, and failure to meet contractual obligations.
Issues identified include overbilling for services, inadequate provider network management, and failure to implement necessary operational reforms. These investigations have resulted in significant financial penalties and mandated operational changes to ensure compliance and improve care delivery.
They perpetuated systemic inefficiencies and fraud, prompting widespread regulatory intervention.
The Impact:
- •Improper billing practices identified
- •Lack of transparency in managed care operations
- •Significant financial penalties imposed

Key Findings
- →State attorneys general launched multiple investigations
- →Documented issues with contract compliance
- →Regulatory actions led to mandated operational changes
Legal Disclaimer
The information presented on this page is compiled from publicly available sources, including news reports, legal documents, and regulatory filings. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is complete, current, or accurate.
The views, information, and opinions expressed are for informational purposes only. This content should not be construed as legal advice, nor does it establish any form of attorney-client relationship. We do not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information.
Any action you take upon the information on this website is strictly at your own risk. We will not be liable for any losses and damages in connection with the use of this information. All information is provided "as is," with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information.
Company names, logos, and trademarks mentioned belong to their respective owners. Their use here is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement. The stories and statistics referenced are based on public records and reporting, but their inclusion should not be interpreted as a definitive judgment of any company or individual.
Please consult with qualified professionals for advice specific to your situation. Your healthcare and insurance decisions should be based on comprehensive research from multiple sources, not solely on the information presented here.